Because rpmsg_virtio_lite is a better name to inform user that the
rpmsg virtio (original name) is a lite implementation of rpmsg virtio.
Signed-off-by: Bowen Wang <wangbowen6@xiaomi.com>
/data/project/code/apache/nuttx/include/nuttx/rpmsg/rpmsg_virtio.h:176:28: error: field ‘rsc_tbl_hdr’ has incomplete type
176 | struct resource_table rsc_tbl_hdr;
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
/data/project/code/apache/nuttx/include/nuttx/rpmsg/rpmsg_virtio.h:178:28: error: field ‘log_trace’ has incomplete type
178 | struct fw_rsc_trace log_trace;
| ^~~~~~~~~
/data/project/code/apache/nuttx/include/nuttx/rpmsg/rpmsg_virtio.h:179:28: error: field ‘rpmsg_vdev’ has incomplete type
179 | struct fw_rsc_vdev rpmsg_vdev;
| ^~~~~~~~~~
/data/project/code/apache/nuttx/include/nuttx/rpmsg/rpmsg_virtio.h:180:28: error: field ‘rpmsg_vring0’ has incomplete type
180 | struct fw_rsc_vdev_vring rpmsg_vring0;
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~
/data/project/code/apache/nuttx/include/nuttx/rpmsg/rpmsg_virtio.h:181:28: error: field ‘rpmsg_vring1’ has incomplete type
181 | struct fw_rsc_vdev_vring rpmsg_vring1;
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~
/data/project/code/apache/nuttx/include/nuttx/rpmsg/rpmsg_virtio.h:182:28: error: field ‘config’ has incomplete type
182 | struct fw_rsc_config config;
Signed-off-by: Bowen Wang <wangbowen6@xiaomi.com>
Use bit mask method to represent the command, because it's more
convenient to express multiple characteristics simultaneously.
Signed-off-by: Yongrong Wang <wangyongrong@xiaomi.com>
Most tools used for compliance and SBOM generation use SPDX identifiers
This change brings us a step closer to an easy SBOM generation.
Signed-off-by: Alin Jerpelea <alin.jerpelea@sony.com>
use reserved[2] in struct resource_table as the command, avoid the
resource table format do not follow the standard.
Signed-off-by: Yongrong Wang <wangyongrong@xiaomi.com>
Move the panic logic in common places, later we can move more logic to
the framework instead of having the drivers implement it repeatedly.
Signed-off-by: Yongrong Wang <wangyongrong@xiaomi.com>
Signed-off-by: Bowen Wang <wangbowen6@xiaomi.com>
Rpmsg Port Uart is a new rpmsg transport layer.
Just like the rpmsg port spi, the difference is that the physical
communication method changed from SPI to UART.
Signed-off-by: Bowen Wang <wangbowen6@xiaomi.com>
Add get_local_cpuname to the rpmsg framework ops to support communicate
with the same remote core with multi rpmsg transport.
Some rpmsg services will send local cpu name to remote core and then let
remote core to connect local core by using this cpu name, when there are
multi rpmsg channels with same remote core, the remote core may connect
to incorrect core, so use the error rpmsg channel.
For example, there are two rpmsg channels between ap and audio:
ap core audio core
[ap1] <-- rpmsg virtio1 --> [audio1]
[ap2] <-- rpmsg virtio2 --> [audio2]
When we want to use the rpmsg virtio1 to communicate, ap core may send
local cpuname "ap2" to audio, so the audio core use remote cpu "ap2" to
connect with ap, and resulting in the use of incorrect rpmsg channel.
Signed-off-by: Bowen Wang <wangbowen6@xiaomi.com>
Rpmsg Router is new rpmsg transport layer, it can router the rpmsg
messages to a cpu that not directly connected with local cpu by Rpmsg,
For the rpmsg services, it is as if there is a real Rpmsg Channel between
the local cpu and the remote cpu.
For examples, there are three cpus: ap, cp and audio.
ap and cp, ap and audio has share memory and be connected by Rpmsg VirtIO,
so ap and cp, ap and audio can communicate with each other by Rpmsg, but
cp can not communicate with audio direclty.
[cp] <-- rpmsg virtio --> [ap] <-- rpmsg virtio --> [audio]
With rpmsg router, the cp can communicate with audip by Rpmsg dereclty because
the router in ap will forward the rpmsg message from cp/audio to audio/cp, like
this:
+<----- rpmsg router --> hub <-- rpmsg router ------>+
| | |
[cp] <-- rpmsg virtio --> [ap] <-- rpmsg virtio --> [audio]
Signed-off-by: yintao <yintao@xiaomi.com>
Add Rpmsg-Port-SPI transport layer.
Rpmsg Port SPI is a new rpmsg transport layer based on the Rpmsg Port,
it provides the capability for two SPI-connected (and two extra GPIO)
chips to communicate with each other using Rpmsg.
All already implemented Rpmsg Services can be used with this new transport
layer without any modifications.
Signed-off-by: liaoao <liaoao@xiaomi.com>
Rpmsg Physical Transport Layer is a new rpmsg transport, it's a
common part for the physical communication based rpmsg transport
layers such as Rpmsg-SPI and Rpmsg-Uart.
It implements three common parts:
1. Implement the NuttX and OpenAMP rpmsg frameworks' ops and the
rpmsg name service;
2. The buffer management and provide some APIs to lower layer to use;
Signed-off-by: liaoao <liaoao@xiaomi.com>
rpmsg_virtio_ivshmem is a ivshmem based rpmsg virtio driver,
with this driver, we can use the rpmsg virtio in qemu platfrom
Signed-off-by: Yongrong Wang <wangyongrong@xiaomi.com>
Signed-off-by: Bowen Wang <wangbowen6@xiaomi.com>
Rpmsg VirtIO is a virtio transport implementation for Rpmsg, and
it's different to the rptun framework.
rpmsg_virtio.c implements the rpmsg virtio transport layer by itself
to avoid use the remoteproc implementation in OpenAMP to save code
size, so it can be treated as a lightweight version of rptun.
Therefore, rpmsg_virtio.c only support the communication feature and
do not support contoll the life cycle of the remote core.
But benefit by it's small footprint, it can be used in the chips with
small flash.
Signed-off-by: Yongrong Wang <wangyongrong@xiaomi.com>
Signed-off-by: Bowen Wang <wangbowen6@xiaomi.com>
It should be possible to use ping without rptun being enabled, so striped rptun_ping out of rptun and rename to rpmsg_ping.
Signed-off-by: wangyongrong <wangyongrong@xiaomi.com>
nuttx/driver/rpmsg: new folder, extract common rpmsg api in rptun.c to rpmsg.c.
rpmsg provide rpmsg_ops to each backend for specific implementation.
Signed-off-by: wangyongrong <wangyongrong@xiaomi.com>
